Skip to content
Political Tracker

16 June 2020 · 4:55 PM · Division 10

Pensions and Benefits

Establish Royal Commission into Robodebt
Official title
Motions - Pensions and Benefits - Establish Royal Commission into Robodebt

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
8
No
36
Not recorded voting
32

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by WA Senator Rachel Siewert (Greens), which means it failed.

Motion text

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) robodebt and the income compliance program has caused enormous harm and trauma to hundreds of thousands of Australians, and

(ii) the Government has not genuinely apologised to robodebt victims;

(b) acknowledges that:

(i) the Government is only refunding illegal debts from 2015, which will leave many victims behind, and

(ii) the social and economic costs of this program have not been fully identified and examined; and

(c) calls on the Government to establish a Royal Commission into robodebt to examine all elements of this program.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
8
No
36
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party025
Australian Greens80
Australian Labor Party04
National Party02
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party02
Jacqui Lambie Network01
Liberal National Party01
Nick Xenophon Team01

How each member voted

Aye · 8

No · 36

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.