1 Sept 2020 · 12:45 PM · Division 3
Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Jobkeeper Payments) Amendment Bill 2020
- Official title
- Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Jobkeeper Payments) Amendment Bill 2020 - in Committee - University workers
Noes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 5
- No
- 28
- Not recorded voting
- 42
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted against amendments introduced by NSW Senator Mehreen Faruqi (Greens), which means they failed. The amendments related to extending JobKeeper payments to university workers.
Amendments text
(3) Clause 2, page 2 (at the end of the table), add:
(7) Page 33, at the end of the Bill, after proposed Schedule 6, add:
Schedule 8 — Extension of jobkeeper scheme to higher education providers
Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Act 2020
1 In the appropriate position
Insert:
7B Requirements for rules that provide for jobkeeper payments scheme—payments to higher education providers
(1) If the rules provide for a kind of payment that is intended to assist businesses affected by the Coronavirus to cover the cost of wages of their employees (whether known as a jobkeeper payment or otherwise), the rules relating to that kind of payment (the jobkeeper scheme rules) must comply with the requirements in subsection (2).
(2) The jobkeeper scheme rules, in providing for the classes of entities to which payments in respect of employees are to be made, must comply with the following requirements in respect of entities that are higher education providers:
(a) the rules must not have eligibility requirements:
(i) that apply only to higher education providers; or
(ii) that apply thresholds to higher education providers that are different from the thresholds applied to other similar entities; or
(iii) that are substantially different in their application to higher education providers compared with other entities;
with the effect of making it impractical or unlikely that higher education providers will be able to satisfy the eligibility requirements;
(b) the eligibility requirements must not have the effect, whether directly or indirectly, of excluding all or substantially all higher education providers from the jobkeeper scheme.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Increasing access to the JobKeeper PaymentSupporters vote Aye
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal Party | 0 | 19 |
| Australian Greens | 4 | 0 |
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 3 |
| Liberal National Party | 0 | 2 |
| National Party | 0 | 2 |
| Country Liberal Party | 0 | 1 |
| Jacqui Lambie Network | 0 | 1 |
| Nick Xenophon Team | 1 | 0 |
How each member voted
Aye · 5
- Mehreen FaruqiNSW · Greens
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Nick McKimTasmania · Greens
- Rachel SiewertWA · Greens
- Rex PatrickSA · Nick Xenophon Team
No · 28
- Don FarrellSA · Labor
- Katy GallagherACT · Labor
- Malarndirri McCarthyNT · Labor
- Sam McMahonNT · CLP
- Jacqui LambieTasmania · Jacqui Lambie Network
- Matthew CanavanQueensland · LNP
- James McGrathQueensland · LNP
- Alex AnticSA · Liberal
- Wendy AskewTasmania · Liberal
- Andrew BraggNSW · Liberal
- Claire ChandlerTasmania · Liberal
- Mathias CormannWA · Liberal
- Jonathon DuniamTasmania · Liberal
- David FawcettSA · Liberal
- Concetta Fierravanti-WellsNSW · Liberal
- Sarah HendersonVictoria · Liberal
- Hollie HughesNSW · Liberal
- Jim MolanNSW · Liberal
- Matt O'SullivanWA · Liberal
- James PatersonVictoria · Liberal
- Gerard RennickQueensland · Liberal
- Linda ReynoldsWA · Liberal
- Anne RustonSA · Liberal
- Scott RyanVictoria · Liberal
- Dean SmithWA · Liberal
- Amanda StokerQueensland · Liberal
- Perin DaveyNSW · Nationals
- Bridget McKenzieVictoria · Nationals
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.