1 Sept 2020 · 12:52 PM · Division 4
Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Jobkeeper Payments) Amendment Bill 2020
- Official title
- Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Jobkeeper Payments) Amendment Bill 2020 - in Committee - Childcare providers
Noes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 5
- No
- 26
- Not recorded voting
- 44
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted against amendments introduced by NSW Senator Mehreen Faruqi (Greens), which means they failed. The motions related to expanding support for childcare providers.
Amendment text
(4) Clause 2, page 2 (at the end of the table), add:
14. Schedule 9
The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
(8) Page 33, at the end of the Bill, after proposed Schedule 8, add:
Schedule 9 — Extension of jobkeeper scheme to child care providers
Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Act 2020
1 In the appropriate position
Insert:
7C Requirements for rules that provide for jobkeeper payments scheme—payments to child care providers
(1) If the rules provide for a kind of payment that is intended to assist businesses affected by the Coronavirus to cover the cost of wages of their employees (whether known as a jobkeeper payment or otherwise), the rules relating to that kind of payment (the jobkeeper scheme rules) must comply with the requirements in subsection (2).
(2) The jobkeeper scheme rules must ensure that payments are able to be made to entities that are approved providers (within the meaning of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) (Administration) Act 1999) of one or more approved child care services (within the meaning of that Act), including in respect of:
(a) employees whose ordinary duties relate principally to the operation of one or more of those services; and
(b) individuals who are not employees but who are actively engaged in the business carried on by the approved provider.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Increasing access to the JobKeeper PaymentSupporters vote Aye
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal Party | 0 | 18 |
| Australian Greens | 4 | 0 |
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 3 |
| Liberal National Party | 0 | 2 |
| National Party | 0 | 2 |
| Country Liberal Party | 0 | 1 |
| Nick Xenophon Team | 1 | 0 |
How each member voted
Aye · 5
- Mehreen FaruqiNSW · Greens
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Nick McKimTasmania · Greens
- Rachel SiewertWA · Greens
- Rex PatrickSA · Nick Xenophon Team
No · 26
- Don FarrellSA · Labor
- Katy GallagherACT · Labor
- Malarndirri McCarthyNT · Labor
- Sam McMahonNT · CLP
- Matthew CanavanQueensland · LNP
- James McGrathQueensland · LNP
- Alex AnticSA · Liberal
- Wendy AskewTasmania · Liberal
- Andrew BraggNSW · Liberal
- Claire ChandlerTasmania · Liberal
- Mathias CormannWA · Liberal
- David FawcettSA · Liberal
- Concetta Fierravanti-WellsNSW · Liberal
- Sarah HendersonVictoria · Liberal
- Hollie HughesNSW · Liberal
- Jim MolanNSW · Liberal
- Matt O'SullivanWA · Liberal
- James PatersonVictoria · Liberal
- Gerard RennickQueensland · Liberal
- Linda ReynoldsWA · Liberal
- Anne RustonSA · Liberal
- Scott RyanVictoria · Liberal
- Dean SmithWA · Liberal
- Amanda StokerQueensland · Liberal
- Perin DaveyNSW · Nationals
- Bridget McKenzieVictoria · Nationals
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.