Skip to content
Political Tracker

2 Sept 2020 · 5:07 PM · Division 18

Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2020

Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea
Official title
Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

Second reading agreed to

Aye
42
No
36
Not recorded voting
73

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion to agree with the main idea of the bill. In parliamentary jargon, they voted to read the bill for a second time.

What does this bill do?

The bill was introduced in order to:

allow the Minister to determine, via a disallowable legislative instrument, that an item is a ‘prohibited thing’ in relation to immigration detention facilities and immigration detainees.

The Government has indicated that items that will be prohibited will include things such as mobile phones and SIM cards, internet capable devices, and illegal drugs. While a broad range of items are likely to be prohibited, the Bill appears to be a reaction to an attempt by the Government in 2017 to seize mobile phones from people held in immigration detention centres, which was found by the Federal Court to be invalid.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
41
No
36
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party033
Liberal Party290
National Party70
Independent12
Liberal National Party30
Centre Alliance01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 41

No · 36

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.