Skip to content
Political Tracker

2 Dec 2020 · 5:10 PM · Division 5

Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Extension of Coronavirus Support) Bill 2020

Consideration in Detail - Liquid assets waiting period
Official title
Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Extension of Coronavirus Support) Bill 2020 - Consideration in Detail - Liquid assets waiting period

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
63
No
58
Not recorded voting
29

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion to disagree with amendment (3), which means the amendment failed. According to Barton MP Linda Burney (Labor), the amendment:

proposes to permanently strike out the minister's ability to exempt people from the liquid assets waiting period. This amendment will remove this part of the bill so that exemptions can still be made. Labor has consistently opposed the reintroduction of the liquid assets waiting period in the midst of a pandemic. The government should not have reinstated the 13-week liquid assets waiting period in September. Most Australians are shocked to find out that, with as little as $5,000 in the bank, people have to wait to receive unemployment support.

Amendment text

(3) Schedule 1, items 39 to 41, page 7 (lines 10 to 15), omit the items.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
62
No
58
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party053
Liberal Party420
National Party120
Liberal National Party50
Independent13
Centre Alliance01
Katter's Australian Party10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10
Speaker01

How each member voted

Aye · 62

No · 58

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.