Skip to content
Political Tracker

3 Dec 2020 · 12:26 PM · Division 10

Paris Agreement

Kyoto carryover credits
Official title
Motions - Paris Agreement - Kyoto carryover credits

Tied vote

Aye
28
No
28
Not recorded voting
20

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The same number of senators voted for and against this motion, which means it failed. Motions like these don't make any legal changes on their own but they can be politically influential as they represent the will of the Senate.

Motion text

That the Senate—

(a) notes that the Morrison Government intends to use so called Kyoto carryover credits to meet its Paris Agreement target even though:

(i) no other country is planning to use Kyoto carryover credits to meet Paris Agreement commitments,

(ii) nine prominent Australian environmental law experts have previously called the use of Kyoto carryover credits in the Paris Agreement 'legally baseless in international law', and

(iii) the Business Council of Australia and BHP among other business groups have called on the Government not to use Kyoto carryover credits; and

(b) calls on the Morrison Government to rule out the use of Kyoto carryover credits to meet Paris Agreement emission reduction targets.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
28
No
28
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party021
Australian Labor Party150
Australian Greens80
National Party02
Nick Xenophon Team20
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party02
Country Liberal Party01
Deputy Senate President01
Independent10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Liberal National Party01
Senate President10

How each member voted

Aye · 28

No · 28

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.