Skip to content
Political Tracker

4 Feb 2021 · 11:30 AM · Division 2

Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry

Stop Mr Chalmers from speaking
Official title
Motions - Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry - Stop Mr Chalmers from speaking

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
62
No
56
Not recorded voting
33

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion:

That the Member [Rankin MP Jim Chalmers (Labor)] be no longer heard.

This means that Mr Chalmers won't be able to speak any further in this debate. These motions are known as gagging motions.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
61
No
56
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party051
Liberal Party440
National Party110
Liberal National Party40
Independent12
Australian Greens01
Katter's Australian Party01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10
Speaker01

How each member voted

Aye · 61

No · 56

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.