Skip to content
Political Tracker

16 Nov 2009 · 5:43 PM · Division 3

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2009 [No. 2]

Official title
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2009 [No. 2] - Consideration in Detail - Don't apply scheme to food production

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
47
No
74
Not recorded voting
27

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Independent MP Tony Windsor. This means that the amendment was rejected.

The amendment was:

Schedule 1, item 159, page 36, after subsection (2A) (after line 27) add:

(2B) The regulations must not declare that emissions of greenhouse gas emitted in connection with the production of food are covered by the carbon pollution reduction scheme.

This amendment would have ensured that food commodities from agricultural products will not be included in the emissions trading scheme.(Read MP Windsor's full explanation of his amendment here. )

Background to the bill

The Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2009 (No. 2) was introduced as part of a package of six bills along with five other related bills to introduce the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme. It is identical to the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2009 as amended in the House of Representatives before it was negated in the Senate.(See that division here. )

The scheme is an emission trading scheme designed to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in an effort to address climate change. It gives effect to Australia's obligations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol.

The design of the scheme has been criticised by the business community for threatening jobs and by environmentalists for not going far enough with its emission reduction targets.(Read more about these criticisms here.)

The six bills that were introduced as a package are called:

The five other related bills are called:

References

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
49
No
76
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party075
Liberal Party400
National Party70
Independent20
CWM01

How each member voted

Aye · 49

No · 76

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.