4 Aug 2021 · 4:12 PM · Division 4
Urban Congestion Fund
- Official title
- Documents - Urban Congestion Fund - Order for the Production of Documents
Ayes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 14
- No
- 13
- Not recorded voting
- 49
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted in favour of a motion introduced by ACT Senator Katy Gallagher (Labor), which means it was successful.
Motion text
That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development, by no later than 10 am on Monday, 9 August 2021, the following documents discussed during a hearing of the Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee (the committee) on 19 July 2021:
(a) any email or document setting out the list of 'top twenty marginal seats' to be 'canvassed' for projects as part of the Urban Congestion Fund (UCF), as referred to by Mr Brian Boyd of the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) on page 5 of the Hansard of the committee's hearing on 19 July 2021;
(b) any spreadsheets created by the Department of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development for the purpose of setting out proposed UCF projects, as referenced in paragraphs 2.30 to 2.32 of the ANAO's report, Administration of commuter car park projects within the Urban Congestion Fund;
(c) any spreadsheets created by, originating in, or shared between the Prime Minister's Office and the offices of the Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development or the Minister for Urban Infrastructure, setting out proposed UCF projects, as referenced in paragraphs 2.30 to 2.32 of the ANAO's report, Administration of commuter car park projects within the Urban Congestion Fund; and
(d) any maps and attached schedules referred to by Mr Boyd of the ANAO on page 8 of the Hansard of the committee's hearing on 19 July 2021, setting out where projected UCF expenditure would take place and the party affiliation of the seats in which that expenditure would occur.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Increasing accessibility of government data and documentsSupporters vote Aye
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal Party | 0 | 10 |
| Australian Labor Party | 9 | 0 |
| Australian Greens | 3 | 0 |
| Jacqui Lambie Network | 1 | 0 |
| Liberal National Party | 0 | 1 |
| National Party | 0 | 1 |
| Nick Xenophon Team | 1 | 0 |
| Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party | 0 | 1 |
How each member voted
Aye · 14
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Nick McKimTasmania · Greens
- Peter Whish-WilsonTasmania · Greens
- Carol BrownTasmania · Labor
- Kim CarrVictoria · Labor
- Anthony ChisholmQueensland · Labor
- Don FarrellSA · Labor
- Katy GallagherACT · Labor
- Deborah O'NeillNSW · Labor
- Louise PrattWA · Labor
- Anne UrquhartBraddon · Labor
- Murray WattQueensland · Labor
- Jacqui LambieTasmania · Jacqui Lambie Network
- Rex PatrickSA · Nick Xenophon Team
No · 13
- James McGrathQueensland · LNP
- Michaelia CashWA · Liberal
- Jonathon DuniamTasmania · Liberal
- Hollie HughesNSW · Liberal
- Marise PayneNSW · Liberal
- Gerard RennickQueensland · Liberal
- Linda ReynoldsWA · Liberal
- Anne RustonSA · Liberal
- Scott RyanVictoria · Liberal
- Zed SeseljaACT · Liberal
- Dean SmithWA · Liberal
- Bridget McKenzieVictoria · Nationals
- Malcolm RobertsQueensland · One Nation
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.