9 Aug 2021 · 7:37 PM · Division 8
Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021
- Official title
- Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea
Second reading agreed to
- Aye
- 28
- No
- 5
- Not recorded voting
- 43
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted in favour of a motion to read the bill for a second time. In other words, they voted to agree with the bill's main idea. This means they can now discuss it in greater detail.
What does this bill do?
According to the bills digest, the bill includes two schedules. The first is not controversial. It will "allow meetings to be held virtually, to allow documents relating to meetings to be provided and signed electronically and for minutes to be kept electronically" (see the bills digest for more information).
Schedule 2 is very controversial, because it effectively waters down current continuous disclosure provisions, as well as misleading and deceptive conduct provisions, by making it harder to enforce civil penalties against people who allegedly breach these provisions.
According to the bills digest, Schedule 2 will:
- permanently add a fault element to continuous disclosure civil penalty provisions, so that a person will only be eligible for a civil penalty where they have acted with knowledge, recklessness or negligence in failing to update the market with price sensitive information
- impose the same fault standard for misleading and deceptive conduct that relates to alleged failure to provide an update with price sensitive information to the market
- retain the existing standard for administrative penalties, so ASIC can continue to issue infringement notices without proving knowledge, recklessness or negligence. The existing standard is also retained for ASIC’s other non-pecuniary enforcement tools, such as requiring the disclosure of information to the market by obtaining a court order.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Increasing transparency of big business by making information publicSupporters vote No
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal Party | 15 | 0 |
| Australian Greens | 0 | 5 |
| Australian Labor Party | 5 | 0 |
| National Party | 2 | 0 |
| Country Liberal Party | 1 | 0 |
| Deputy Senate President | 1 | 0 |
| Jacqui Lambie Network | 1 | 0 |
| Liberal National Party | 1 | 0 |
| Nick Xenophon Team | 1 | 0 |
| Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party | 1 | 0 |
How each member voted
Aye · 28
- Carol BrownTasmania · Labor
- Anthony ChisholmQueensland · Labor
- Katy GallagherACT · Labor
- Anne UrquhartBraddon · Labor
- Murray WattQueensland · Labor
- Sam McMahonNT · CLP
- Slade BrockmanWA · Deputy Senate President
- Jacqui LambieTasmania · Jacqui Lambie Network
- Matthew CanavanQueensland · LNP
- Wendy AskewTasmania · Liberal
- Michaelia CashWA · Liberal
- Claire ChandlerTasmania · Liberal
- Jane HumeVictoria · Liberal
- Matt O'SullivanWA · Liberal
- James PatersonVictoria · Liberal
- Gerard RennickQueensland · Liberal
- Linda ReynoldsWA · Liberal
- Anne RustonSA · Liberal
- Scott RyanVictoria · Liberal
- Paul ScarrQueensland · Liberal
- Ben SmallForrest · Liberal
- Dean SmithWA · Liberal
- Amanda StokerQueensland · Liberal
- David VanVictoria · Liberal
- Perin DaveyNSW · Nationals
- Bridget McKenzieVictoria · Nationals
- Rex PatrickSA · Nick Xenophon Team
- Malcolm RobertsQueensland · One Nation
No · 5
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Nick McKimTasmania · Greens
- Rachel SiewertWA · Greens
- Larissa WatersQueensland · Greens
- Peter Whish-WilsonTasmania · Greens
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.