9 Aug 2021 · 8:45 PM · Division 11
Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021
- Official title
- Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Get rid of exemption to scrutiny
Tied vote
- Aye
- 17
- No
- 17
- Not recorded voting
- 42
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The same number of senators voted for and against amendments introduced by SA Senator Rex Patrick (Independent), which means they failed.
What did the amendments do?
Senator Patrick explained that:
This is not the first time I've moved this amendment. I do hope it is the last. If needed, I will move it again and again and again, on every Treasury bill that comes through the Senate. I'll do it for however long it takes to repeal what is a completely unjustifiable and indefensible exemption, which gives dozens of Australian billionaires the chance to keep their private companies' financial statements and how much tax they do or don't pay a secret. There's an old saying that there's one rule for the rich and another rule for everybody else. Well, in this case, that is literally the truth. We've had a legal loophole for more than a quarter of a century that continues to keep Australia's super rich free from scrutiny and likely facilitates aggressive tax minimisation.
For senators who haven't kept abreast of this, my amendment will rid the Federal Register of Legislation of an extraordinary provision in the Corporations Act which exempts a select list of large proprietary companies from having to lodge financial reports with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. That exemption includes the companies' financial statements and directors' declarations to ASIC. This is highly problematic. The exemption has inappropriately created and entrenched in place a highly privileged class of companies that are not subject to the transparency and disclosure regimes that apply to every other company. If my amendment passes, then that completely inappropriate and unjustified legislative privilege will be abolished.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Increasing transparency of big business by making information publicSupporters vote Aye · counts strongly
- Stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisationSupporters vote Aye · counts strongly
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal Party | 0 | 13 |
| Australian Labor Party | 9 | 0 |
| Australian Greens | 5 | 0 |
| Deputy Senate President | 0 | 1 |
| Jacqui Lambie Network | 1 | 0 |
| Liberal National Party | 0 | 1 |
| National Party | 0 | 1 |
| Nick Xenophon Team | 1 | 0 |
| Senate President | 1 | 0 |
| Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party | 0 | 1 |
How each member voted
Aye · 17
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Nick McKimTasmania · Greens
- Rachel SiewertWA · Greens
- Larissa WatersQueensland · Greens
- Peter Whish-WilsonTasmania · Greens
- Carol BrownTasmania · Labor
- Kim CarrVictoria · Labor
- Anthony ChisholmQueensland · Labor
- Don FarrellSA · Labor
- Katy GallagherACT · Labor
- Deborah O'NeillNSW · Labor
- Louise PrattWA · Labor
- Anne UrquhartBraddon · Labor
- Murray WattQueensland · Labor
- Jacqui LambieTasmania · Jacqui Lambie Network
- Rex PatrickSA · Nick Xenophon Team
- Sue LinesWA · Senate President
No · 17
- Slade BrockmanWA · Deputy Senate President
- Matthew CanavanQueensland · LNP
- Wendy AskewTasmania · Liberal
- Michaelia CashWA · Liberal
- Jonathon DuniamTasmania · Liberal
- Jane HumeVictoria · Liberal
- James PatersonVictoria · Liberal
- Marise PayneNSW · Liberal
- Gerard RennickQueensland · Liberal
- Linda ReynoldsWA · Liberal
- Anne RustonSA · Liberal
- Paul ScarrQueensland · Liberal
- Zed SeseljaACT · Liberal
- Dean SmithWA · Liberal
- Amanda StokerQueensland · Liberal
- Bridget McKenzieVictoria · Nationals
- Malcolm RobertsQueensland · One Nation
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.