Skip to content
Political Tracker

9 Aug 2021 · 8:45 PM · Division 11

Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021

in Committee - Get rid of exemption to scrutiny
Official title
Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Get rid of exemption to scrutiny

Tied vote

Aye
17
No
17
Not recorded voting
42

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The same number of senators voted for and against amendments introduced by SA Senator Rex Patrick (Independent), which means they failed.

What did the amendments do?

Senator Patrick explained that:

This is not the first time I've moved this amendment. I do hope it is the last. If needed, I will move it again and again and again, on every Treasury bill that comes through the Senate. I'll do it for however long it takes to repeal what is a completely unjustifiable and indefensible exemption, which gives dozens of Australian billionaires the chance to keep their private companies' financial statements and how much tax they do or don't pay a secret. There's an old saying that there's one rule for the rich and another rule for everybody else. Well, in this case, that is literally the truth. We've had a legal loophole for more than a quarter of a century that continues to keep Australia's super rich free from scrutiny and likely facilitates aggressive tax minimisation.

For senators who haven't kept abreast of this, my amendment will rid the Federal Register of Legislation of an extraordinary provision in the Corporations Act which exempts a select list of large proprietary companies from having to lodge financial reports with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. That exemption includes the companies' financial statements and directors' declarations to ASIC. This is highly problematic. The exemption has inappropriately created and entrenched in place a highly privileged class of companies that are not subject to the transparency and disclosure regimes that apply to every other company. If my amendment passes, then that completely inappropriate and unjustified legislative privilege will be abolished.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
17
No
17
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party013
Australian Labor Party90
Australian Greens50
Deputy Senate President01
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Liberal National Party01
National Party01
Nick Xenophon Team10
Senate President10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 17

No · 17

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.