9 Aug 2021 · 8:51 PM · Division 12
Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021
- Official title
- Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Agree with bill as amended
Ayes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 19
- No
- 17
- Not recorded voting
- 40
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted in favour of a motion to agree to the bill, as amended. This vote ends the 'in committee' stage of debate and means that the Senate can now decide on whether they wish to pass the bill in its amended form.
What does this bill do?
According to the bills digest, the bill includes two schedules. The first is not controversial. It will "allow meetings to be held virtually, to allow documents relating to meetings to be provided and signed electronically and for minutes to be kept electronically" (see the bills digest for more information).
Schedule 2 is very controversial, because it effectively waters down current continuous disclosure provisions, as well as misleading and deceptive conduct provisions, by making it harder to enforce civil penalties against people who allegedly breach these provisions.
According to the bills digest, Schedule 2 will:
- permanently add a fault element to continuous disclosure civil penalty provisions, so that a person will only be eligible for a civil penalty where they have acted with knowledge, recklessness or negligence in failing to update the market with price sensitive information
- impose the same fault standard for misleading and deceptive conduct that relates to alleged failure to provide an update with price sensitive information to the market
- retain the existing standard for administrative penalties, so ASIC can continue to issue infringement notices without proving knowledge, recklessness or negligence. The existing standard is also retained for ASIC’s other non-pecuniary enforcement tools, such as requiring the disclosure of information to the market by obtaining a court order.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Increasing transparency of big business by making information publicSupporters vote No
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal Party | 15 | 0 |
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 9 |
| Australian Greens | 0 | 5 |
| Deputy Senate President | 1 | 0 |
| Jacqui Lambie Network | 0 | 1 |
| Liberal National Party | 1 | 0 |
| National Party | 1 | 0 |
| Nick Xenophon Team | 0 | 1 |
| Senate President | 0 | 1 |
| Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party | 1 | 0 |
How each member voted
Aye · 19
- Slade BrockmanWA · Deputy Senate President
- Matthew CanavanQueensland · LNP
- Wendy AskewTasmania · Liberal
- Michaelia CashWA · Liberal
- Jonathon DuniamTasmania · Liberal
- Hollie HughesNSW · Liberal
- Jane HumeVictoria · Liberal
- James PatersonVictoria · Liberal
- Marise PayneNSW · Liberal
- Gerard RennickQueensland · Liberal
- Linda ReynoldsWA · Liberal
- Anne RustonSA · Liberal
- Paul ScarrQueensland · Liberal
- Zed SeseljaACT · Liberal
- Ben SmallForrest · Liberal
- Dean SmithWA · Liberal
- Amanda StokerQueensland · Liberal
- Bridget McKenzieVictoria · Nationals
- Malcolm RobertsQueensland · One Nation
No · 17
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Nick McKimTasmania · Greens
- Rachel SiewertWA · Greens
- Larissa WatersQueensland · Greens
- Peter Whish-WilsonTasmania · Greens
- Carol BrownTasmania · Labor
- Kim CarrVictoria · Labor
- Anthony ChisholmQueensland · Labor
- Don FarrellSA · Labor
- Katy GallagherACT · Labor
- Deborah O'NeillNSW · Labor
- Louise PrattWA · Labor
- Anne UrquhartBraddon · Labor
- Murray WattQueensland · Labor
- Jacqui LambieTasmania · Jacqui Lambie Network
- Rex PatrickSA · Nick Xenophon Team
- Sue LinesWA · Senate President
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.