Skip to content
Political Tracker

10 Aug 2021 · 5:14 PM · Division 2

Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021

Consideration of Senate Message - Agree and so pass bill
Official title
Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree and so pass bill

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
43
No
35
Not recorded voting
73

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion "That the amendments be agreed to." This means that the bill is now passed in its current form in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, and so it will now become law.

Isaacs MP Mark Dreyfus (Labor) explained why the Labor Party would not be supporting this motion, while the Government did not make any further contributions on the subject.

What does this bill do?

According to the bills digest, the bill includes two schedules. The first is not controversial. It will "allow meetings to be held virtually, to allow documents relating to meetings to be provided and signed electronically and for minutes to be kept electronically" (see the bills digest for more information).

Schedule 2 is very controversial, because it effectively waters down current continuous disclosure provisions, as well as misleading and deceptive conduct provisions, by making it harder to enforce civil penalties against people who allegedly breach these provisions.

According to the bills digest, Schedule 2 will:

  • permanently add a fault element to continuous disclosure civil penalty provisions, so that a person will only be eligible for a civil penalty where they have acted with knowledge, recklessness or negligence in failing to update the market with price sensitive information
  • impose the same fault standard for misleading and deceptive conduct that relates to alleged failure to provide an update with price sensitive information to the market
  • retain the existing standard for administrative penalties, so ASIC can continue to issue infringement notices without proving knowledge, recklessness or negligence. The existing standard is also retained for ASIC’s other non-pecuniary enforcement tools, such as requiring the disclosure of information to the market by obtaining a court order.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
42
No
35
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party032
Liberal Party270
National Party110
Independent11
Liberal National Party20
Australian Greens01
Centre Alliance10
Speaker01

How each member voted

Aye · 42

No · 35

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.