Skip to content
Political Tracker

9 Feb 2022 · 3:53 AM · Division 7

Religious Discrimination Bill 2021

Third Reading - Pass the bill
Official title
Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

Third reading agreed to

Aye
91
No
6
Not recorded voting
54

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding. 1 voted differently from most of their party.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion to pass the bill, which means it will now go to the Senate for their consideration. In parliamentary jargon, the majority voted to read the bill for a third time.

There was one rebellion, with Bass MP Bridget Archer (Liberal) crossing the floor to vote 'No' against the rest of her party, who voted 'Yes.'

What does the bill do?

According to the bill homepage, the bill was introduced with the Religious Discrimination (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2021 and Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 in order to:

  • prohibit discrimination on the basis of a person’s religious belief or activity in a range of areas of public life, including in relation to employment, education, access to premises and the provision of goods, services and accommodation;
  • establish general and specific exceptions from the prohibition of religious discrimination;
  • provide that certain statements of belief do not constitute discrimination for the purposes of certain specified Commonwealth, state or territory anti-discrimination laws;
  • create offences in relation to victimisation and discriminatory advertisements;
  • establish the office of the Religious Discrimination Commissioner;
  • confer certain functions on the Australian Human Rights Commission; and
  • provide for miscellaneous matters including delegation of powers or functions, protection from civil actions and a review of the operation of the Act.

SBS News has provided a good summary of the more controversial parts of the bill, including an explanation for each rebellion that occurred during the long debate. According to this summary, the key areas for concern were:

  • the parts of the bill that allowed religious schools to discriminate on the basis of sexuality and gender identity;
  • the "statement of belief" that seems to protect people expressing religious beliefs even if they're offensive and therefore seem to override existing anti-discrimination protections; and
  • the fact that the bill does not outlaw vilification of people of faith.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
90
No
6
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party431
Australian Labor Party290
National Party120
Independent03
Liberal National Party30
Australian Greens01
Centre Alliance01
Katter's Australian Party10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10
Speaker10

How each member voted

Aye · 90

No · 6

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.