Skip to content
Political Tracker

26 Oct 2022 · 10:46 AM · Division 1

Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023, Supply Bill (No. 4) 2022-2023 and another

Second Reading - Repeal stage 3 tax cuts
Official title
Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023, Supply Bill (No. 4) 2022-2023 and another - Second Reading - Repeal stage 3 tax cuts

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
12
No
28
Not recorded voting
36

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bills be read a second time" - parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. It had been introduced by Tasmanian Senator Nick McKim (Greens).

Motion text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:

(a) notes that Labor's first budget gives a $9,000 per year tax cut to billionaires and locks in the $254 billion stage 3 tax cuts for the wealthy; and

(b) calls on the Labor Government to repeal the stage 3 tax cuts and provide cost of living relief that will make people's lives better, including by putting dental and mental healthcare into Medicare, building more affordable housing, and making childcare free".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
12
No
28
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party118
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party06
Australia's Voice01
Independent10
Liberal National Party01
Senate President01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 12

No · 28

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.