Skip to content
Political Tracker

27 Oct 2022 · 1:27 PM · Division 10

Australian Human Rights Commission Legislation Amendment (Selection and Appointment) Bill 2022

in Committee - Human Rights Commissioner for LGBTIQA+ people
Official title
Australian Human Rights Commission Legislation Amendment (Selection and Appointment) Bill 2022 - in Committee - Human Rights Commissioner for LGBTIQA+ people

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
13
No
31
Not recorded voting
32

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments introduced by NSW Senator David Shoebridge (Greens), which means they failed.

What do these amendments do?

Senator Shoebridge explained that:

As I indicated in my second reading contribution, these amendments seek to amend the bill to provide for an LGBTIQA+ human rights commissioner. The Greens have been approached by a variety of organisations and community groups, from across the broader law reform community but especially from the LGBTIQA+ community, who have been asking for this for decades. We've been approached by Just.Equal Australia, who raised the very real issue that the reform in the bill just does not go far enough, and that's why we're moving for the well-overdue appointment of a standalone LGBTIQA+ human rights commissioner.

In response, Queensland Senator Anthony Chisholm (Labor) explained that:

We certainly understand the strong sentiment that has been expressed by members of the community over a long period of time now about a dedicated LGBTIQA+ commissioner, but we are of the view, as I mentioned in summing up, that this bill is not the vehicle to create such a position. The government recognises that it's important to consider how the commission can best operate to promote and protect the human rights of all members of the Australian community, including LGBTIQA+ people.

There is no doubt that there will be further discussion on this proposal, as well as other opportunities to strengthen the work of the commission in the future, but the critical issue that this bill will address is restoring the international standing of our commission by urgently addressing the specific issues around transparent and merit based appointments raised by the global alliance to support the commission's reaccreditation. That is what the focus of this bill is today. As I mentioned before, it is not possible to make such changes as this and for it to go back to the House of Representatives.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
13
No
31
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party120
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party05
Independent20
Australia's Voice01
Deputy Senate President01
Jacqui Lambie Network01
Liberal National Party01
Senate President01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 13

No · 31

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.