6 Mar 2023 · 12:46 PM · Division 2
Paid Parental Leave Amendment (Improvements for Families and Gender Equality) Bill 2022
- Official title
- Paid Parental Leave Amendment (Improvements for Families and Gender Equality) Bill 2022 - in Committee - Extend parental leave
Noes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 12
- No
- 27
- Not recorded voting
- 36
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted against amendment requests (1) to (5) on sheet 1819 moved by Queensland Senator Larissa Waters (Greens), which means they failed.
Amendment text
(1) Schedule 1, item 2, page 4 (line 13), omit "100", substitute "130".
(2) Schedule 1, item 38, page 13 (line 6), omit "100", substitute "130".
(3) Schedule 1, item 66, page 25 (line 19), omit "90", substitute "120".
(4) Schedule 1, item 66, page 25 (line 31), omit "100", substitute "130".
(5) Schedule 1, item 66, page 26 (line 12), omit "100", substitute "130".
————
Statement pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000
Amendments (3), (4) and (5)
Amendments (3), (4) and (5) are framed as requests because they amend the bill to increase the maximum number of days for which paid parental leave can be paid in relation to a child from 100 days to 130 days.
As this will increase the total amount of paid parental leave that can be paid, the amendments will increase the amount of expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 307 of the Paid Parental Leave Act 2010.
Amendments (1) and (2)
Amendments (1) and (2) are consequential to amendments (3), (4) and (5).
Statement by the Clerk of the Senate pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000
Amendments (3), (4) and (5)
If the effect of the amendments is to increase expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 307 of the Paid Parental Leave Act 2010 then it is in accordance with the precedents of the Senate that the amendments be moved as requests.
Amendments (1) and (2)
These amendments are consequential on the requests. It is the practice of the Senate that an amendment that is consequential on an amendment framed as a request may also be framed as a request.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 19 |
| Australian Greens | 10 | 0 |
| Liberal Party | 0 | 5 |
| Independent | 2 | 0 |
| Australia's Voice | 0 | 1 |
| National Party | 0 | 1 |
| Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party | 0 | 1 |
How each member voted
Aye · 12
- Penny Allman-PayneQueensland · Greens
- Mehreen FaruqiNSW · Greens
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Nick McKimTasmania · Greens
- Barbara PocockSA · Greens
- Janet RiceVictoria · Greens
- David ShoebridgeNSW · Greens
- Jordon Steele-JohnWA · Greens
- Larissa WatersQueensland · Greens
- Peter Whish-WilsonTasmania · Greens
- David PocockACT · Independent
- Lidia ThorpeVictoria · Independent
No · 27
- Fatima PaymanWA · Australia's Voice
- Tim AyresNSW · Labor
- Anthony ChisholmQueensland · Labor
- Raff CicconeVictoria · Labor
- Patrick DodsonWA · Labor
- Don FarrellSA · Labor
- Katy GallagherACT · Labor
- Nita GreenQueensland · Labor
- Karen GroganSA · Labor
- Jenny McAllisterNSW · Labor
- Deborah O'NeillNSW · Labor
- Helen PolleyTasmania · Labor
- Louise PrattWA · Labor
- Tony SheldonNSW · Labor
- Marielle SmithSA · Labor
- Glenn SterleWA · Labor
- Jana StewartVictoria · Labor
- Anne UrquhartBraddon · Labor
- Jess WalshVictoria · Labor
- Linda WhiteVictoria · Labor
- Alex AnticSA · Liberal
- Sarah HendersonVictoria · Liberal
- Andrew McLachlanSA · Liberal
- Anne RustonSA · Liberal
- Paul ScarrQueensland · Liberal
- Ross CadellNSW · Nationals
- Malcolm RobertsQueensland · One Nation
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.