Skip to content
Political Tracker

9 Mar 2023 · 10:16 AM · Division 1

Therapeutic Goods Amendment (2022 Measures No. 1) Bill 2022

Second Reading - Giving blood
Official title
Therapeutic Goods Amendment (2022 Measures No. 1) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Giving blood

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
15
No
23
Not recorded voting
37

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Victorian Senator Janet Rice (Greens) to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time". To read a bill for a second time is to agree with its main idea.

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate calls on the Government and the Therapeutic Goods Administration to urgently remove barriers to gay and bisexual men, trans women and some non-binary people who have sex with men giving blood, including by replacing the current approach of a population-based risk assessment and the 3-month deferral period with an approach based on an individual risk assessment".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
15
No
23
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party216
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party04
Independent20
Australia's Voice01
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Liberal National Party01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 15

No · 23

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.