Skip to content
Political Tracker

27 Mar 2023 · 12:22 PM · Division 1

Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022

Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea
Official title
Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

Second reading agreed to

Aye
89
No
56
Not recorded voting
5

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of agreeing with the main idea of the bill. In parliamentary jargon, they voted to read the bill for a second time. This means that they can now consider it in more detail.

What is the bill's main idea?

The bills digest, which is a document put together by the parliamentary library, sets out the following key points:

  • Proposed revision of the existing ‘Safeguard Mechanism’ applying to Australia’s largest emitters is a central element of the Australian Government’s commitment to achieve a 43% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and net zero by 2050.
  • The Safeguard Mechanism commenced operation on 1 July 2016 and has, to date, operated as a greenhouse gas emissions reporting mechanism for around 212 of Australia’s largest industrial facilities.
  • The Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022 amends relevant Acts to alter the Safeguard Mechanism so that covered facilities must reduce their scope 1 (direct) emissions in future.
  • The primary amendments to the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 and Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Act 2011 establish the administrative architecture to create ‘safeguard mechanism credit units’ (SMCs). The amendments provide for dealings in SMCs in the same manner as Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs).
  • Key elements of the revised scheme will be implemented via amendments to existing legislative instruments (rules) made by the Minister. The Clean Energy Regulator (CER) will also be able to make key determinations, as provided for in these instruments.
  • Stakeholders have expressed concern about the limited timeframe for consultation and staggered release of key documents (including legislative instruments and the Independent Review of Australian Carbon Credit Units (Chubb Review)), which they regard as limiting a fulsome consideration of the proposed amendments.
  • Moreover, whilst environment and climate focused groups have argued that amendments are insufficient, key industry stakeholders acknowledge the need for change but have expressed concern about particular aspects of the proposed amendments.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
89
No
55
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party740
Liberal Party033
National Party012
Independent100
Liberal National Party08
Australian Greens40
Centre Alliance10
Katter's Australian Party01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 89

No · 55

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.