Skip to content
Political Tracker

10 May 2023 · 11:33 AM · Division 1

Public Interest Disclosure Amendment (Review) Bill 2022

Second Reading - Whistleblowers
Official title
Public Interest Disclosure Amendment (Review) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Whistleblowers

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
12
No
27
Not recorded voting
36

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion "that the bill be read a second time" (giving a bill a second reading is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

This amendment would not have made any legal changes, but would have been politically influential if it had succeeded as it would have represented the will of the Senate. It was introduced by NSW Senator David Shoebridge (Greens).

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add “, but the Senate:

(a) recognises the need for further reforms to whistleblower laws; and

(b) supports ending the current prosecutions of whistleblowers David McBride and Richard Boyle and ensuring that what happened to them does not happen in the future”.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
12
No
27
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party117
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party05
National Party02
Australia's Voice01
Independent10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 12

No · 27

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.