Skip to content
Political Tracker

20 June 2023 · 6:11 PM · Division 7

Treasury Laws Amendment (2022 Measures No. 4) Bill 2022

in Committee - Keep schedule 2
Official title
Treasury Laws Amendment (2022 Measures No. 4) Bill 2022 - in Committee - Keep schedule 2

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
33
No
26
Not recorded voting
17

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion that schedule 2 remain as it is. This vote was put after NSW Senator Andrew Bragg (Liberal) proposed that that schedule be removed.

When proposing the amendment to oppose the schedule, he explained that:

As I foreshadowed in my contribution to the second reading debate, this amendment excises the section which deals with the taxation treatment of digital currencies. It does that on the basis that there is a separate process underway through the Board of Taxation and this would introduce unnecessary regulatory risk in a very sensitive area. It will also do it on the basis that it won't be removing any consumer protections or, indeed, driving any new innovation.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
33
No
26
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party190
Liberal Party017
Australian Greens100
National Party03
Liberal National Party02
Australia's Voice10
Country Liberal Party01
Deputy Senate President01
Independent10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 33

No · 26

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.