Skip to content
Political Tracker

9 Aug 2023 · 11:06 AM · Division 3

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2023

in Committee - Safeguard on sharing information
Official title
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2023 - in Committee - Safeguard on sharing information

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
9
No
27
Not recorded voting
40

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments introduced by NSW Senator David Shoebridge (Greens), which means they failed.

What was the purpose of the amendments?

Senator Shoebridge explained that:

These amendments, taken together, would amend the two substantive elements of this bill which currently provide a capacity for the Attorney-General to limit the sharing of the foreign intelligence information obtained under a warrant whereby the bill as drafted permits the Attorney-General to specify a purpose for which the information can be shared. But the drafting, very intentionally, in providing purpose, if any, identified by the Attorney-General, does not require the Attorney-General to so specify the purpose for which the information can be shared.

Given the government's position that there are critical safeguards in the bill, it's our view that that should be more than verbiage, it should be included in the actual drafting of the bill. These amendments taken together require the Attorney-General to put a purpose in and, to avoid doubt, provide that foreign intelligence information cannot be communicated if the Attorney-General does not approve in writing any purposes. That's the ultimate safeguard.

Amendment text

(1) Schedule 1, item 1, page 3 (line 9), omit "(if any)".

(2) Schedule 1, item 1, page 3 (after line 21), after subsection 65(1B), insert:

(1C) To avoid doubt, foreign intelligence information must not be communicated under subsection (1A) if the Attorney-General does not approve, in writing, any purposes for the purposes of paragraph (1A)(b).

(3) Schedule 1, item 3, page 3 (line 29), omit "(if any)".

(4) Schedule 1, page 4 (after line 6), after item 4, insert:

4A After subsection 65(2)

Insert:

(2A) To avoid doubt, foreign intelligence information must not be communicated or used under paragraph (2)(a) if the Attorney-General does not approve, in writing, any purposes for the purposes of that paragraph.

(6) Schedule 1, item 7, page 4 (line 15), omit "(if any)".

(7) Schedule 1, item 7, page 4 (after line 27), after subsection 137(1B), insert:

(1C) To avoid doubt, foreign intelligence information must not be communicated under subsection (1A) if the Attorney-General does not approve, in writing, any purposes for the purposes of paragraph (1A)(a).

(8) Schedule 1, item 9, page 5 (line 5), omit "(if any)".

(9) Schedule 1, item 9, page 5 (after line 14), after subsection 137(3), insert:

(3A) To avoid doubt, foreign intelligence information must not be communicated or used under paragraph (3)(a) if the Attorney-General does not approve, in writing, any purposes for the purposes of that paragraph.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
9
No
27
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party121
Australian Greens80
Liberal Party02
Australia's Voice01
Independent01
National Party01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 9

No · 27

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.