Skip to content
Political Tracker

13 Sept 2023 · 10:46 AM · Division 3

Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 and two others

Second Reading - Against immigration
Official title
Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 and two others - Second Reading - Against immigration

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
3
No
36
Not recorded voting
37

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate calls on the Albanese Government to:

(a) recognise:

(i) that Australia is already the fourth quickest builder of housing in the entire OECD;

(ii) the decision to allow over 1 million arrivals from net immigration and student visas in 12 months is the primary driver of the housing crisis;

(iii) no amount of public expenditure on housing can fix the crisis facing Australians without significant change to the demand side of housing economics; and

(b) abandon its irresponsible immigration intake in order to address the housing crisis".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
3
No
36
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party020
Australian Greens010
Liberal Party02
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party20
Australia's Voice01
Independent01
Jacqui Lambie Network01
Senate President01
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 3

No · 36

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.