Skip to content
Political Tracker

14 Nov 2023 · 12:36 PM · Division 2

Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Australia's Engagement in the Pacific) Bill 2023

Second Reading - Fossil fuels
Official title
Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Australia's Engagement in the Pacific) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Fossil fuels

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
9
No
30
Not recorded voting
36

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Tasmanian Senator Nick McKim (Greens), which means it failed. This amendment text would have been added to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (to read a bill for a second time is to agree with its main idea).

Amendment text

… but the Senate:

(a) notes the advocacy of Pacific leaders that the greatest threat to the wellbeing of the region is the threat of runaway global heating caused by the burning of coal, oil and gas; and

(b) resolves that Australia must:

(i) not open up any new coal mines or gas fields; and

(ii) remove the billions of dollars spent each year subsidising the exploration, extraction and burning of fossil fuels".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
9
No
30
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party020
Australian Greens90
Liberal Party06
Australia's Voice01
National Party01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 9

No · 30

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.