17 Nov 2023 · 12:07 PM · Division 4
Disability Services and Inclusion Bill 2023 and another
A vote on changing the text of a bill or motion, not on passing it.
- Official title
- Disability Services and Inclusion Bill 2023 and another - in Committee - Greens amendments
Noes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 12
- No
- 20
- Not recorded voting
- 43
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted against requests for amendments and an amendment introduced by Victorian Senator Janet Rice (Greens).
What is the purpose of these amendments?
Senator Rice explained that:
These amendments relate to improving the accessibility to and improving the rate of the disability support pension, which are critical and central to meeting the objective of this act to achieve the economic and social inclusion of people with disabilities. As I noted in my second reading speech, the Senate community affairs committee did a very comprehensive inquiry into the adequacy of the disability support pension a couple of years back. That committee made some consensus recommendations, but we have not had a response from government on those recommendations, which is pretty upsetting given how much work went into that committee report and the input that we had from people with disabilities. As I said, the recommendations we came up with had cross-party support. What these amendments seek to do is to implement some of those recommendations. [...]
These amendments would raise the base rate of the Disability Support Pension. They would increase the income-free area for people under 21, make the program of support voluntary and remove the requirement that a condition be diagnosed, reasonably treated and stabilised. Our amendments go further than any recent reforms to the payment, and are an absolutely critical step to improving the accessibility, the inclusivity and the adequacy of the payment.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 1 | 14 |
| Australian Greens | 10 | 0 |
| Liberal Party | 0 | 4 |
| Australia's Voice | 0 | 1 |
| Independent | 1 | 0 |
| National Party | 0 | 1 |
How each member voted
Aye · 12
- Penny Allman-PayneQueensland · Greens
- Mehreen FaruqiNSW · Greens
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Nick McKimTasmania · Greens
- Barbara PocockSA · Greens
- Janet RiceVictoria · Greens
- David ShoebridgeNSW · Greens
- Jordon Steele-JohnWA · Greens
- Larissa WatersQueensland · Greens
- Peter Whish-WilsonTasmania · Greens
- Dorinda CoxWA · Labor
- David PocockACT · Independent
No · 20
- Fatima PaymanWA · Australia's Voice
- Catryna BilykTasmania · Labor
- Anthony ChisholmQueensland · Labor
- Raff CicconeVictoria · Labor
- Katy GallagherACT · Labor
- Nita GreenQueensland · Labor
- Karen GroganSA · Labor
- Deborah O'NeillNSW · Labor
- Louise PrattWA · Labor
- Tony SheldonNSW · Labor
- Marielle SmithSA · Labor
- Glenn SterleWA · Labor
- Jana StewartVictoria · Labor
- Anne UrquhartBraddon · Labor
- Jess WalshVictoria · Labor
- Simon BirminghamSA · Liberal
- Claire ChandlerTasmania · Liberal
- Sarah HendersonVictoria · Liberal
- Anne RustonSA · Liberal
- Ross CadellNSW · Nationals
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.