Skip to content
Political Tracker

6 Dec 2023 · 4:46 PM · Division 7

Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee

Official title
Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee; Reference - NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs & Anor

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
27
No
29
Not recorded voting
20

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by Tasmanian Senator Wendy Askew (Liberal) in the name of WA Senator Michaelia Cash (Liberal), which means it failed.

Motion text

That the following matter be referred to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee for inquiry and report by 6 May 2024:

The Commonwealth Government's response to the 8 November 2023 High Court ruling in NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs & Anor, with particular reference to:

(a) the Commonwealth Government's planning and preparedness for a ruling against the Commonwealth Government in this case;

(b) the Commonwealth Government's preparation of legislation to address the implications of the High Court ruling;

(c) the risks to the community associated with the release of individuals from immigration detention following the High Court ruling;

(d) actions taken by the Commonwealth Government in the days following the High Court ruling, including:

(i) the decision to release individuals from immigration detention, and to subsequently grant visas including conditions,

(ii) the enforceability of visa conditions,

(iii) the steps the Government took to manage risks to the community associated with the release of the cohort of individuals impacted by the High Court decision,

(iv) other interventions or options the Government considered but did not pursue to manage risks to the community associated with the release of the cohort of individuals impacted by the High Court decision,

(v) communication with individuals in immigration detention impacted by the High Court ruling,

(vi) efforts made to inform victims and victims' families about the release of individuals convicted of serious crimes, and

(vii) communication with impacted communities where individuals released from detention will reside;

(e) any expenditure of taxpayer money associated with the High Court case and subsequent actions taken by the Commonwealth Government; and

(f) any other related matters.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
27
No
29
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party118
Liberal Party160
Australian Greens08
National Party40
Liberal National Party20
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party20
Australia's Voice01
Independent01
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President01
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 27

No · 29

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.