Skip to content
Political Tracker

6 Dec 2023 · 7:28 PM · Division 18

Interactive Gambling Amendment (Credit and Other Measures) Bill 2023

Second Reading - Political influence of wagering industry
Official title
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Credit and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Political influence of wagering industry

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
11
No
24
Not recorded voting
41

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read for a second time" (to give a bill a second reading is to agree with its main idea). This amendment was introduced by ACT Senator David Pocock (Independent).

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:

(a) commits to diminishing the political influence of the online wagering industry, in the interests of protecting Australians and harm reduction strategies from industry influence; and

(b) calls on all politicians and all political parties to stop accepting political donations from the online wagering industry and revoke any passes that they have sponsored for members of the industry, and their agents, to access Parliament House".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
11
No
24
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party116
Australian Greens80
Liberal Party04
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party02
Australia's Voice01
Independent10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 11

No · 24

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.