Skip to content
Political Tracker

20 Mar 2024 · 11:49 AM · Division 4

National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Amendment Bill 2023

in Committee - Expand to current residents
Official title
National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Amendment Bill 2023 - in Committee - Expand to current residents

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
15
No
22
Not recorded voting
38

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against request (1) on sheet 2475, which means it failed. It was introduced by Victorian Senator Lidia Thorpe (Independent). The request was to put an amendment to the bill, as set out below. It would have extended the National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Act 2018 to people who currently reside in Australia. As it stands, the Scheme only applies to Australian citizens and permanent residents.

Request text

That the House of Representatives be requested to make the following amendment:

(1)—Schedule 1, page 15 (after line 17), after Part 4, insert:

Part 4B — Expanded access to redress

National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Act 2018

19D Section 4 (paragraph (e) of the paragraph beginning "To be entitled to redress")

Omit "or a permanent resident", substitute ", a permanent resident or currently resides in Australia".

19E Section 11 (paragraph beginning "Then the person must")

Omit "or a permanent resident", substitute ", a permanent resident or currently resides in Australia".

19F Paragraph 13(1)(e)

Repeal the paragraph, substitute:

(e) the person is an Australian citizen or a permanent resident (within the meaning of the Australian Citizenship Act 2007), or a person who currently resides in Australia, at the time the person applies for redress.

Statement pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000

Amendment (1)

Amendment (1) is framed as a request because it amends the bill to expand the eligibility criteria for redress payable under the National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Act 2018. The effect of the amendment is to extend eligibility to persons who currently reside in Australia at the time they apply for redress, even if they are not an Australian citizen or a permanent resident.

As the amendment is intended to increase the number of individuals that would be eligible to receive a redress payment, the amendment is likely to increase the expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 161 of the National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Act 2018.

Statement by the Clerk of the Senate pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000

Amendment (1)

If the effect of the amendment is to increase expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 161 of the National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Act 2018 then it is in accordance with the precedents of the Senate that the amendment be moved as a request.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
15
No
22
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party217
Australian Greens100
Independent20
National Party02
Australia's Voice01
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Liberal Party01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 15

No · 22

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.