Skip to content
Political Tracker

26 Mar 2024 · 4:45 PM · Division 13

Afghanistan Inquiry Implementation Oversight Panel

Order for the Production of Documents
Official title
Documents — Afghanistan Inquiry Implementation Oversight Panel; Order for the Production of Documents

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
31
No
30
Not recorded voting
14

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Malcolm Roberts

I move:

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) order for production of documents no. 474, agreed to by the Senate on 28 February 2024, requiring the Afghanistan Inquiry Implementation Oversight Panel Final Report to be tabled, has not been complied with,

(ii) the Minister for Defence claimed the document may contain prejudicial information, and

(iii) order for production of documents no. 491, agreed to by the Senate on 18 March 2024, requiring documents to be tabled containing advice the report contained prejudicial information and the date the government expects to complete consultation with identifying information redacted, has not been complied with;

(b) rejects the public interest immunity claim advanced by the Minister for Defence for orders nos 474 and 491, and notes that:

(i) the claim does not address the apprehended harm that could result from the provision of the documents in redacted form, and

(ii) order no. 491 requiring the Minister to provide the advice in relation to prejudice has not been complied with; and

(c) requires the Minister representing the Minister for Defence to comply with orders nos 474 and 491 by no later than 2 pm on Wednesday, 27 March 2024.

Sue Lines

The question is that general business No. 506 standing in the name of Senator Roberts be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
31
No
30
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party200
Australian Labor Party118
Australian Greens010
Independent20
Liberal National Party20
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party20
Australia's Voice01
Country Liberal Party10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
National Party10
Senate President01
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 31

No · 30

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.