Skip to content
Political Tracker

26 Mar 2024 · 4:48 PM · Division 14

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

Order for the Production of Documents
Official title
Documents — Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps; Order for the Production of Documents

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
41
No
18
Not recorded voting
16

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Claire Chandler

I, and also on behalf of Senators Birmingham and Paterson, move:

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) order for the production of documents no. 472, agreed to by the Senate on 27 February 2024, requiring certain documents concerning the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to be provided to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS) has not been complied with,

(ii) on 21 March 2024, the Senate rejected the claim of public interest immunity made by the Attorney-General, and

(iii) on 25 March 2024, the Minister representing the Attorney-General advised the Senate that the Attorney-General '...reasserts his claim of public interest immunity in relation to the documents sought...as their disclosure would, or might reasonably be expected to, disclosure information that would be damaging to Australia's national security';

(b) again rejects the public interest immunity claim advanced by the Attorney General, noting that the claim still does not address the apprehended harm that could result from the provision of the documents to the PJCIS on a confidential basis;

(c) requires the Minister representing the Attorney-General to attend the chamber on Wednesday, 27 March 2024, at the conclusion of consideration of private senators' bills and immediately prior to government business being called on, to provide an explanation of no more than 5 minutes of the failure to comply with the order and to explain the apprehended harm that could result from the provision of the documents to the PJCIS on a confidential basis;

(d) any senator may move to take note of the explanation required by paragraph (c); and

(e) any motion under paragraph (d) may be debated for no longer than 30 minutes, shall have precedence over all business until determined, and senators may speak to the motion for not more than 5 minutes each.

Sue Lines

The question is that general business notice of motion No. 507 standing in the names of Senators Birmingham, Paterson and Chandler be agreed to.

The Senate divided. [16:48]

(The President—Senator Lines)

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
41
No
18
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party190
Australian Labor Party216
Australian Greens100
Independent20
Liberal National Party20
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party20
Australia's Voice01
Country Liberal Party10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
National Party10
Senate President01
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 41

No · 18

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.