Skip to content
Political Tracker

14 May 2024 · 5:39 PM · Division 2

Communications Legislation Amendment (Prominence and Anti-Siphoning) Bill 2023

Consideration in Detail - Shorten timeframe
Official title
Communications Legislation Amendment (Prominence and Anti-Siphoning) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Shorten timeframe

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
13
No
61
Not recorded voting
77

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments introduced by North Sydney MP Kylea Tink (Independent), which means they failed.

What do the amendments do?

Ms Tink explained that:

The amendments I'm moving today would shorten the timeframe for the prominence provisions to come into effect to 12 months after the bill passes. As the bill currently stands, manufacturers would have an 18-month transition period, after which they would be required to ensure that their prominence obligations have been met. Having reviewed the views of many stakeholders, the submissions made to the Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee and the recommendations of that committee, I believe it is both appropriate and feasible to fast-track the prominence provisions.

Amendment text

(1) Schedule 1, item 1, page 17 (line 14), omit "18 months", substitute "12 months".

(2) Schedule 1, item 24, page 24 (line 7), omit "18 months", substitute "12 months".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
13
No
61
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party054
Independent90
Australian Greens40
Liberal National Party02
Liberal Party02
National Party02
Centre Alliance01

How each member voted

Aye · 13

No · 61

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.