Skip to content
Political Tracker

16 May 2024 · 6:01 PM · Division 21

Administrative Review Tribunal Bill 2024 and two others

Official title
Administrative Review Tribunal Bill 2024 and two others - Committee of the Whole - Registry in each State and Territory

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
13
No
44
Not recorded voting
18

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments moved by Tasmanian Senator Nick McKim (Greens) on behalf of the Australian Greens, which means they failed.

Amendment text

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW TRIBUNAL BILL 2024

(1) Clause 237, page 203 (after line 17), at the end of the clause, add:

Registrar in each State, in the Australian Capital Territory and in the Northern Territory

(3) The Principal Registrar must ensure that at least one registrar is appointed in each State, in the Australian Capital Territory and in the Northern Territory.

(2) Clause 243, page 208 (lines 2 to 4), omit the clause, substitute:

243 Registries

The Minister must cause such registries of the Tribunal to be established as the Minister thinks fit, but so that at least one registry shall be established in each State, in the Australian Capital Territory and in the Northern Territory.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
13
No
44
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party119
Liberal Party017
Australian Greens100
Liberal National Party02
National Party02
Australia's Voice01
Deputy Senate President01
Independent10
Senate President01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 13

No · 44

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.