Skip to content
Political Tracker

6 June 2024 · 12:49 PM · Division 2

Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Bill 2024

Second Reading - Decline second reading
Official title
Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Decline second reading

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
52
No
84
Not recorded voting
15

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Hume MP Angus Taylor (Liberal), which means it failed. The amendment would have replaced the usual text of the second reading motion with that below.

What is a second reading motion?

The usual second reading motion is "that the bill be read a second time", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill.

Amendment text

That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:

"the House declines to give the bill a second reading, and notes:

(1) Australia is in an entrenched GDP per capita recession and almost 17,000 businesses have gone insolvent since the government came to power;

(2) Treasury analysis confirms this Bill imposes $2.3 billion in compliance costs in its first year of operation, with no productivity benefit;

(3) ASIC and the Australian Small and Family Business Enterprise Ombudsman have confirmed to Senate Estimates that this compliance cost will be passed on to small businesses;

(4) the United States, Canada, Japan, and most of Australia's trading partners do not require the reporting of scope 3 emissions. The Productivity Commission has confirmed to Senate estimates that this sort of misalignment in regulation will harm investment and make Australian business less competitive; and

(5) while the Coalition is not opposed to reasonable disclosure regimes, this legislation is a red tape bomb that will hurt Australian farmers, small businesses, and ultimately raise prices."

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
51
No
84
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party073
Liberal Party310
National Party110
Liberal National Party90
Independent08
Australian Greens03

How each member voted

Aye · 51

No · 84

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.