Skip to content
Political Tracker

6 June 2024 · 4:05 PM · Division 4

National Disability Insurance Scheme

Suspend the usual procedural rules
Official title
Motions - National Disability Insurance Scheme - Suspend the usual procedural rules

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
53
No
70
Not recorded voting
28

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion to suspend the usual procedural rules of parliament - known as standing and sessional orders - in order to let another motion be moved. It was introduced by Bradfield MP Paul Fletcher (Liberal).

Motion text

That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent the Manager of Opposition Business from moving the following motion forthwith:

That the Minister for the National Disability Insurance Scheme be required to come into the House immediately and withdraw his factually incorrect claims about the issue of media releases concerning the NDIS and fraud under the previous coalition government, and apologise for misleading the House.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
52
No
70
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party070
Liberal Party290
National Party110
Liberal National Party90
Australian Greens30

How each member voted

Aye · 52

No · 70

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.