Skip to content
Political Tracker

25 June 2024 · 6:04 PM · Division 9

Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2024-2025 and four others

Second Reading - Coal and gas
Official title
Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2024-2025 and four others - Second Reading - Coal and gas

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
12
No
29
Not recorded voting
35

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Tasmanian Senator Nick McKim (Greens), which means it failed. The amendment would have added the text below to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea).

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add “, but the Senate is of the view that:

(a) public money should not be used to support the new extraction and burning of coal and gas, while there is a climate crisis;

(b) the proportion of the $566 million for Geoscience Australia to map coal and gas reserves and providing this information to coal and gas corporations for free should be removed from the budget; and

(c) the $1.5 billion equity injection to facilitate the construction of the Middle Arm Gas and Petrochemical Hub should be removed from the Contingency Reserve .”

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
12
No
29
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party117
Australian Greens90
Liberal Party09
Independent20
Australia's Voice01
Jacqui Lambie Network01
National Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 12

No · 29

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.