Skip to content
Political Tracker

26 June 2024 · 10:46 AM · Division 6

Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Vaping Reforms) Bill 2024

Second Reading - Measures to determine success or failure
Official title
Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Vaping Reforms) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Measures to determine success or failure

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
27
No
32
Not recorded voting
17

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by South Australian Senator Anne Ruston (Liberal), which means it failed. It would have added the words below to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add “, but the Senate calls on the Government to:

(a) provide definitive and objective measures on what it considers constitutes the success or failure of this bill; and

(b) if these measures are not met, move to alternative regulatory models such as allowing vaping products to be sold in general retail”.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
27
No
32
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party122
Liberal Party180
Australian Greens08
National Party30
Liberal National Party20
Australia's Voice01
Country Liberal Party10
Deputy Senate President10
Independent01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 27

No · 32

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.