Skip to content
Political Tracker

3 July 2024 · 1:00 PM · Division 2

Nature Positive (Environment Protection Australia) Bill 2024 and two others

Second Reading - Criticism of bills
Official title
Nature Positive (Environment Protection Australia) Bill 2024 and two others - Second Reading - Criticism of bills

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
9
No
93
Not recorded voting
49

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Ryan MP Elizabeth Watson-Brown (Greens) to an original amendment introduced by Fairfax MP Ted O'Brien (Liberal), which means it failed.

Amendment text

That all words after “House” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:

(1) notes that the Government has broken its commitment to create laws that protect nature;

(2) notes that these three bills will not protect wildlife, will not stop native forest logging and will not stop the continued expansion of coal and gas;

(3) calls on the Government to amend this legislation to:

(a) end native forest logging and the destruction of critical habitat;

(b) assess projects properly for their climate impacts to stop the expansion of further fossil fuels; and

(c) commit to a timeframe for an exposure draft of standalone cultural heritage legislation”.

Original amendment

That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:

“the House:

(1) expresses its commitment to making changes to national environmental laws that are genuinely beneficial for both the environment and business;

(2) notes that these three bills do not meaningfully improve Australia’s environmental laws, and that they have particular shortcomings in each of the following forms :

(a) the expansion of the EPA’s proposed remit well beyond the compliance and data functions promised by the ALP in 2022;

(b) the excessive size, and lack of proportionality, of the new penalties;

(c) the requirement for more regular, earlier reviews of the operation of the EPA than is mandated in this bill;

(d) the need for clearer limits on the range of circumstances in which environment protection orders can be applied;

(e) the lack of accompanying information about the full regulatory and financial impacts of the bill, including on cost recovery; and

(3) calls on the Government to finally honour their long-flagged promise to introduce a full package of new National Environmental Standards and an overhauled EPBC Act”.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
9
No
93
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party048
Liberal Party027
National Party08
Independent61
Liberal National Party07
Australian Greens30
Centre Alliance01
Katter's Australian Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 9

No · 93

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.