Skip to content
Political Tracker

14 Aug 2024 · 3:44 PM · Division 4

Rearrangement

Procedural motion

A vote on how Parliament conducts its business, not on a law itself.

Official title
Business — Rearrangement

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
20
No
38
Not recorded voting
18

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Katy Gallagher

At the request of Senator Chisholm, I move:

That on Thursday, 15 August 2024:

(a) the questions on all remaining stages of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment (Administration) Bill 2024 be put at 12.15 pm;

(b) paragraph (a) operate as a limitation of debate under standing order 142; and

(c) divisions may take place between 1.30 pm and 2 pm until consideration of the bill has concluded.

Jonathon Duniam

I seek leave to make a short statement.

Sue Lines

Leave is granted for one minute.

Jonathon Duniam

The coalition, of course, will be opposing this motion. The Senate needs more time to consider and properly scrutinise this bill. Given Senator Cash has advised Minister Watt that we're unable to support this motion because we're in the middle of negotiations with the government to strengthen this legislation and make it fit for purpose, it's unreasonable to demand a guillotine tomorrow considering there's still work to do. We're all negotiating in good faith on how the bill should be changed.

Murray Watt

I seek leave to make a short statement.

Sue Lines

Leave is granted for one minute.

Murray Watt

Senator Duniam is correct, and I think it's a matter of public record that discussions have begun between the government and the opposition about the bill itself. The motion which we're currently debating sets a deadline of 12.15 pm tomorrow to pass the bill itself. I note that Senator Cash has publicly said today that the opposition wants to move this and pass this legislation through the Senate tomorrow, so I invite the opposition to nominate an alternative time tomorrow afternoon by which they would be prepared to pass the bill, in line with what Senate Cash has said. I invite the opposition to move an amendment to our motion to nominate a time tomorrow, in line with what Senator Cash has said publicly.

Sue Lines

The question is that government business No. 1, standing in the name of Senator Chisholm and moved by Senator Gallagher, be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
20
No
38
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party181
Liberal Party018
Australian Greens09
National Party03
Liberal National Party02
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party02
Deputy Senate President01
Independent01
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President10
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 20

No · 38

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.