Skip to content
Political Tracker

15 Sept 2011 · Division 6

Carbon Tax Plebiscite Bill 2011

Second Reading - Read a second time
Official title
Carbon Tax Plebiscite Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Read a second time

Second reading defeated

Aye
70
No
71
Not recorded voting
9

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion to read the Carbon Tax Plebiscite Bill 2011 a second time.(Read more about the bill here. )

This means that the majority of members rejected the main idea of the bill and so it will not be considered any further.

Debate in Parliament

The bill called for a referendum to be held on 26 November 2011 on whether the Government should introduce the carbon pricing mechanism. It was introduced by Tony Abbott MP, the Leader of the Opposition, as a private member's bill.(Read MP Abbott's explanation of the bill here. )

Several Labor MPs described the bill as a "stunt".(Read their contributions here. )

Background to the bill

The carbon pricing mechanism is to commence on 1 July 2012.(More information on the carbon pricing mechanism and how it worked can be found on the Clean Energy Regulator’s website.) It is an emissions trading scheme that puts a price on carbon emissions. It applies to “liable entities” (a group that includes companies that emit a high level of greenhouse gases). Initially the price of carbon will be fixed by the mechanism but from 1 July 2015 the price will be set by the market.

References

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
70
No
71
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party066
Liberal Party560
National Party120
Independent03
Australian Greens01
CWM01
Country Liberal Party10
Katter's Australian Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 70

No · 71

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.