Skip to content
Political Tracker

19 Sept 2024 · 12:56 PM · Division 8

Australian Human Rights Commission Amendment (Costs Protection) Bill 2023

in Committee - Review
Official title
Australian Human Rights Commission Amendment (Costs Protection) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Review

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
27
No
30
Not recorded voting
19

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments introduced by ACT Senator David Pocock (Independent), which means they failed.

Amendment text

(1) Page 2 (after line 12), after clause 3, insert:

4 Review of operation of amendments

(1) The Minister must cause an independent review to be undertaken of the operation of the amendments made by this Act.

(2) The review must commence no later than 2 years after the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.

(3) The persons who conduct the review must give the Minister a written report of the review within 6 months of the commencement of the review.

(4) The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be tabled in each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after the report is given to the Minister.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
27
No
30
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party120
Liberal Party180
Australian Greens09
National Party30
Independent20
Country Liberal Party10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Liberal National Party10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 27

No · 30

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.