Skip to content
Political Tracker

8 Oct 2024 · 3:46 PM · Division 1

Gambling Advertising

Ban
Official title
Motions - Gambling Advertising - Ban

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
16
No
25
Not recorded voting
35

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by ACT Senator David Pocock (Independent), which means it failed.

Motion text

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) Australians overwhelmingly support a full ban on gambling advertisements,

(ii) Australians are denied access to information that would reveal the influence of the gambling industry on Commonwealth ministers and parliamentarians through:

(A) secrecy around ministerial diaries, and

(B) a complete lack of transparency around parliamentary passes provided to lobbyists; and

(b) calls on the Government to:

(i) legislate a complete ban on gambling advertising,

(ii) provide transparency around sponsored passes provided to lobbyists, and

(iii) publish ministerial diaries.

Rebellions

Note that West Australian Senator Fatima Payman (independent) and Queensland Senator Gerard Rennick (Independent) are currently listed as rebel voters but this is inaccurate because the senators are no longer part of the Labor Party and Liberal Party respectively.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
16
No
25
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party118
Australian Greens90
Liberal Party25
Independent20
Australia's Voice10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 16

No · 25

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.