Skip to content
Political Tracker

7 Nov 2024 · 11:45 AM · Division 1

Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024

Second Reading - Murdoch media
Official title
Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Murdoch media

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
5
No
60
Not recorded voting
86

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). This means the original motion will remain unchanged. The amendment was introduced by Melbourne MP Adam Bandt (Greens).

Motion text

That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:

"whilst not declining to give the Bill a second reading, the House:

(1) notes this bill is still before Senate inquiry;

(2) notes the proposed legislation does not address the powerful, unchecked role that the Murdoch media empire plays in spreading mis- and disinformation in our democracy; and

(3) calls on the government to tackle mis- and disinformation spread by the Murdoch media".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
5
No
60
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party045
Independent18
Australian Greens40
National Party02
Centre Alliance01
Katter's Australian Party01
Liberal National Party01
Liberal Party01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 5

No · 60

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.