Skip to content
Political Tracker

26 Nov 2024 · 9:45 PM · Division 22

Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Bill 2024

Second Reading - Criticism of Government
Official title
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Criticism of Government

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
24
No
31
Not recorded voting
21

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). The amendment was introduced by Victorian Senator Sarah Henderson (Liberal).

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate notes that:

(a) the Government's economic mismanagement and cost-of-living crisis has led to higher wage bills, and higher utility, rent and grocery bills for providers;

(b) the bill will place further administrative burden on providers, particularly small and medium providers;

(c) the Government's decision to include a workplace instrument in this bill is unnecessary and puts pressure on service providers to unionise their workforce;

(d) the bill will put further financial pressure on providers who will have to cover the majority of the on-costs, cannot increase their fees and have to pay the wages upfront, whilst receiving reimbursement in arrears;

(e) the Government has still not provided all relevant details of the grant program to service providers, which has put further undue stress on service providers, and created confusion within the sector;

(f) the Government has done nothing to address child care deserts and thin markets around the country, and this bill will not increase access for parents who currently have none; and

(g) the bill is a one-off sugar hit, which will only increase inflation and further contribute to current cost-of-living pressures".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
24
No
31
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party020
Liberal Party170
Australian Greens010
National Party30
Liberal National Party20
Country Liberal Party10
Independent01
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 24

No · 31

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.