11 Feb 2025 · 5:11 PM · Division 2
Social Security Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes) Bill 2025
- Official title
- Social Security Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes) Bill 2025 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea
Second reading agreed to
- Aye
- 81
- No
- 5
- Not recorded voting
- 63
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted in favour of agreeing with the main idea of the bill. In parliamentary jargon, they voted to read the bill for a second time. This means they can now consider it in more detail.
What does this bill do?
According to the explanatory memorandum (which is a political documents prepared by the party that introduces the bill):
The Social Security Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes) Bill 2025 (the Bill) amends the Social Security Act 1991 to make provision for the payment of different rates for disability support pension recipients aged under 21, depending on their circumstances. This includes a lower single dependent living at home rate, and a higher independent rate, consisting with longstanding policy and service delivery arrangements.
The Minister for Social Security Amanda Rishworth (Kingston MP) explained further that:
These technical amendments are necessary as a recent merits review decision highlighted an unintended consequence of the Employment and Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Welfare to Work and Other Measures) Act 2005. Those changes introduced the partial-capacity-to-work rule to the independence criteria, which was intended to apply to youth allowance recipients only. It's now understood that a drafting error in the 2005 amendments means that certain DSP recipients under 21 are impacted. This in turn affected the rates of support those recipients were entitled to receive. Without this bill, it would mean that arrangements would be at odds with the objective of Australia's Disability Strategy, providing a perverse incentive for young people to drop out of study, and apprenticeships. This bill is important to maintain the current arrangements for youth DSP payment rates and will validate past rate decisions, consistent with the longstanding policy intent of these arrangements. I commend the bill to the House.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 72 | 0 |
| Independent | 8 | 1 |
| Australian Greens | 0 | 4 |
| Liberal Party | 1 | 0 |
How each member voted
Aye · 81
- Anthony AlbaneseGrayndler · Labor
- Anne AlyCowan · Labor
- Michelle Ananda-RajahVictoria · Labor
- Jodie BelyeaDunkley · Labor
- Chris BowenMcMahon · Labor
- Tony BurkeWatson · Labor
- Matt BurnellSpence · Labor
- Linda BurneyBarton · Labor
- Josh BurnsMacnamara · Labor
- Alison ByrnesCunningham · Labor
- Andrew CharltonParramatta · Labor
- Lisa ChestersBendigo · Labor
- Jason ClareBlaxland · Labor
- Sharon ClaydonNewcastle · Labor
- Libby CokerCorangamite · Labor
- Julie CollinsFranklin · Labor
- Mary DoyleAston · Labor
- Mark DreyfusIsaacs · Labor
- Justine ElliotRichmond · Labor
- Cassandra FernandoHolt · Labor
- Mike FreelanderMacarthur · Labor
- Carina GarlandChisholm · Labor
- Steve GeorganasAdelaide · Labor
- Andrew GilesScullin · Labor
- Patrick GormanPerth · Labor
- Luke GoslingSolomon · Labor
- Julian HillBruce · Labor
- Ed HusicChifley · Labor
- Ged KearneyCooper · Labor
- Matt KeoghBurt · Labor
No · 5
- Adam BandtMelbourne · Greens
- Stephen BatesBrisbane · Greens
- Max Chandler-MatherGriffith · Greens
- Elizabeth Watson-BrownRyan · Greens
- Andrew WilkieClark · Independent
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.