Skip to content
Political Tracker

20 Nov 2024 · 3:53 PM · Division 5

Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee

Reference
Official title
Committees — Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee; Reference

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
26
No
28
Not recorded voting
22

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Sue Lines

I remind senators that yesterday evening after 6.30 pm a division was called on the following motion moved by Senator Hanson relating to a proposed reference to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee:

That the following matter be referred to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee for inquiry and report by 10 February 2025:

The failure of the Albanese Government's immigration policies to manage population growth and protect Australians' interests, with particular reference to:

(a) the Government's failure to meet immigration targets and the impact of allowing record numbers of migrants into the country without adequate planning;

(b) the role of mass immigration in driving up housing costs, worsening the rental crisis and locking Australians out of homeownership;

(c) the unchecked influx of international students and the strain this placing on housing and services;

(d) the strain on infrastructure, essential services and the environment caused by rapid, immigration-driven population growth;

(e) the lack of clear and accountable processes for managing visa programs, including the Government's failure to enforce promised restrictions;

(f) the uneven impact of immigration, creating unsustainable pressure on cities while diverting resources away from rural and regional areas and stifling their development;

(g) the failure to address critical skills shortages through alternative methods, such as increasing apprenticeship subsidies and investing in local workforce development, instead of relying on high immigration; and

(h) any other related matters.

I understand it suits the convenience of the Senate for the deferred vote to be held now. The question is that the deferred vote, as moved by Senator Hanson, be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
26
No
28
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party117
Liberal Party170
Australian Greens08
Liberal National Party20
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party20
Australia's Voice01
Country Liberal Party10
Deputy Senate President10
Independent01
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President01
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 26

No · 28

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.