Skip to content
Political Tracker

27 Nov 2024 · 9:55 AM · Division 3

Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024

Consideration in Detail - Exempt providers
Official title
Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Exempt providers

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
15
No
44
Not recorded voting
92

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments introduced by Goldstein MP Zoe Daniel (Independent), which means it failed and will not be included in the bill.

What do the amendments do?

Ms Daniel explained that:

... what I've attempted to do with these amendments is to create an exemption framework in order that social media platforms may be able to bridge the gap between having to ban young people from being inside a platform and actually doing something about the way that they run their platforms.

Amendment text

See the House debates for the text of the amendments.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
15
No
44
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party041
Independent100
Australian Greens40
Liberal Party02
Centre Alliance10
National Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 15

No · 44

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.