Skip to content
Political Tracker

27 Nov 2024 · 10:23 AM · Division 7

Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024

Consideration in Detail - Personal data harvesting
Official title
Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Personal data harvesting

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
17
No
48
Not recorded voting
86

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments introduced by Mayo MP Rebekha Sharkie (Centre Alliance), which means they failed.

What do the amendments do?

Ms Sharkie explained that:

The amendments seek to address age verification, and this bill explicitly defers the commencement of age verification to provide the industry and the eSafety Commissioner with sufficient time to develop and implement appropriate systems. My amendment would prevent social media platforms and other tech giants from requiring personal ID documentation for the purposes of age verification. Personal data is highly valued by corporations and particularly by social media companies, and so I think it's incredibly important that we do not provide an environment that greenlights the harvesting of personal data under the guise of protecting under-16s. I therefore call on the House to support these amendments to provide some safety around this bill for the personal data of millions of Australians with social media accounts.

Amendment texts

(1) Schedule 1, item 7, page 4 (after line 21), after the paragraph beginning "Providers of certain kinds" in section 63A, insert:

Providers of social media platforms must not require an individual to produce identification documents for the purposes of verifying the individual’s age.

(2) Schedule 1, item 7, page 6 (line 23), omit "penalty", substitute "penalties".

(3) Schedule 1, item 7, page 7 (after line 13), after section 63E, insert:

63EA Civil penalty for requiring identification documents

(1) A provider of an age-restricted social media platform must not require an individual to produce an identification document for the purposes of verifying the age of the individual.

Civil penalty: 500 penalty units.

(2) In this section:

identification document means a document or other thing that:

(a) contains identification information; and

(b) can be used to identify an individual; and

(c) is issued by or on behalf of a government authority.

(4) Schedule 1, item 7, page 10 (after line 2), after paragraph 63J(a), insert:

(aa) has contravened section 63EA (requiring identification documents); or

(5) Schedule 1, item 13, page 11 (after line 3), after paragraph (da), insert:

(daa) section 63EA;

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
17
No
48
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party046
Independent100
Australian Greens40
Liberal Party11
Centre Alliance10
Katter's Australian Party10
National Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 17

No · 48

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.