Skip to content
Political Tracker

27 Nov 2024 · 10:33 AM · Division 8

Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024

Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill
Official title
Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
102
No
13
Not recorded voting
36

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding. 1 voted differently from most of their party.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion to agree with the bill. This means they will stop considering the bill in detail and will instead now consider whether to pass the bill in the House of Representatives.

Rebellions

There was one rebellion during this division, with Bass MP Bridget Archer (Liberal) voting No against the rest of the Liberal Party, who voted Yes.

What does the bill do?

According to the bills digest (which is a document prepared by the parliamentary library):

  • The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 (the Bill) introduces an obligation on certain social media platforms to take reasonable steps to prevent children under 16 years of age from having an account.
  • It is the responsibility of the eSafety Commissioner to write guidelines on the ‘reasonable steps’ to be taken by age-restricted social media platforms.
  • Details on what may be included in these guidelines, such as what age estimation or age verification technology may be used, is not included in the Bill.
  • The obligation for certain social media platforms to restrict under-age account holders will not commence for at least 12 months, with the date to be set by the Minister.
  • Research, including by the eSafety Commissioner, suggests that there are both benefits and risks to social media use by children, and that these benefits and risks are individualised.
  • The Bill has bipartisan support. However, some experts and researchers in relevant fields have encouraged the government to pursue alternative action.
  • The Bill has been referred to the Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee for inquiry and report by 26 November 2024.
  • At the time of writing, the Bill has not been considered by any parliamentary scrutiny committees.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
101
No
13
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party530
Liberal Party281
Independent46
National Party100
Liberal National Party50
Australian Greens04
Centre Alliance01
Katter's Australian Party01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 101

No · 13

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.