Skip to content
Political Tracker

27 Nov 2024 · 11:36 AM · Division 5

Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) Bill 2024

Second Reading - Cross examination of victim-survivors
Official title
Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Cross examination of victim-survivors

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
13
No
26
Not recorded voting
37

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by Queensland Senator Larissa Waters (Greens), which means it failed. It would have added the text below to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

Motion text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:

(a) notes that:

(i) in 2019 the Family Law Act 1975 was amended to ban personal cross-examination of parties where there are allegations of family violence between the examining party and the witness party, and

(ii) it is time the same protection was afforded to victim-survivors of sexual violence; and

(b) calls on the Government to prohibit personal cross-examination of a victim-survivor by the accused".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
13
No
26
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party220
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party03
Independent10
National Party01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 13

No · 26

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.