Skip to content
Political Tracker

4 July 2024 · 11:37 AM · Division 5

Nature Positive (Environment Protection Australia) Bill 2024

Consideration in Detail - Board of EPA
Official title
Nature Positive (Environment Protection Australia) Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Board of EPA

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
13
No
31
Not recorded voting
107

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments introduced by Mackellar MP Sophie Scamps (Independent), which means they were not successful.

What did these amendments do?

Dr Scamps explained that:

My amendments to the legislation are simple and are in line with what the environmental community and integrity organisations have been calling for. Simply put, my amendments create an independent board to sit above the EPA, like so many other organisations have. This board would oversee the functions of the EPA and, importantly, select the CEO. The board's functions would include appointing the CEO, determining policies and long-term strategic plans for the CEO, advising the CEO and assessing and reporting on the CEO's performance. The board would have up to seven members, each with substantial experience and knowledge and significant standing in an area relevant to the EPA's functions. At least one board member must be an Indigenous person.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
13
No
31
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party030
Independent100
Australian Greens30
National Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 13

No · 31

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.